>>83447592>basically saying that if they had not gone public then they would’ve had to sell the company instead.With what overhead? No, seriously, the company literally makes tens of millions on donations and merch. The only way that'd be true is if the company was in the red every single quarter of every single year which we know for a fact isn't true.
Who does he think he's fooling?
>>83447663Also this, the time money and manpower put into that could have easily supported the company for another 5 years and the fact it even exists goes to show that this whole pissing around about how "the company would have been sold off!" means fucking nothing.
