Quoted By:
if niji does a lawsuit, here's what they needs:
>prove dokis posts were direct cause of stock dip
>prove selen/pom/kyo graduations and terminations were not cause
>prove selen firing was justified(optional, but helpful)
this is because if the graduations and terminations were the cause of stock losses, that is the companys decision, not selen/doki posting. that bar, even with the retard JP laws is high enough to be on the moon. niji's own mismanagement and shit company actions are a far more reasonable explanation as to why their stock plummeted on a JP exchange, blaming it on EN social media is retarded
if doki tries a harassment/workplace lawsuit they need:
>prove harassment(some evidence of which is LIVE ON OFFICIAL SOCIAL MEDIA RIGHT NOW)
>prove distress
>prove management knew or caused either(not required, but adds zeroes to the judgement number)
notice doki doesn't even have to consider the termination for their suit by comparison. they can skip over it because a harassment suit is easier to win and likely to pay out more. this sort of suit would be easy for niji themselves to dodge by axing the whole branch and throwing the entire thing under the bus by handing doki all documents asked for. but there's an even easier case that is being overlooked.
doki sues for lack of payment and compensation regarding events/projects:
>prove that they paid instead of niji
>prove that niji provided some assurance they would compensate/offset the payments (this can literally be just ONE text)
>prove relevance to work completed for niji
>prove pattern of behavior(optional, but useful for NA lawsuits for punitive damages)
this lawsuit is so fucking free that im shocked its not already settled out of court. any number of the artists who claim selen paid them directly could be used as testimony. any NDA's that were signed would be voided for the purposes of the suit(if they even got the people involved to sign them because apparently they never did on most projects)
