>>106591935>That is the only acceptable part of this situation.The point is that you cannot really determine what an acceptable situation is, because you don't know anything, not even the details.
So the implications are always wrong.
>It was her who made a donatathon about how she has cancer and the money given to her will go to cancerHow do you know anything taken from that donation were used for her cancer treatment and not something else?
How can you be so sure she used those exact moneys for the things you listed, and she hasn't used her savings for other livestreams for doing that?
That's how the "mentality excuses" actually works. You aren't 100% sure how she's managing her moneys and her funds, and you don't even know her real plans.
Even here, then, the implications are always wrong.
