>>98892260>Anon, no such argument has been madeYour argument: "you are sexually attracted to 2D, and that makes you a pedophile in every sense of the word"
Therefore, you're saying if I like lolis, which are 2D, that must also apply in 3D. Thus, you made the same argument that: "if you play violent fictional games, you must want to be violent in real like". You just dodged it because you know you made a super stupid point.
>>I have evidence of something entirely irrelevant to the subject!Nope. You being an anti-lolicon calling other pedos is complete and utter projection, or at least a lot of your ilk are
https://archive.fo/2023.03.03-135448/https://imgur.com/a/VoyXLbx And letting you dodge that would be helping you, and that's not going to happen.