>>43461853It's an attempt to help you consider the implications of what you were saying.
For example, trannies are insane faggots, and so calling someone a tranny is insulting, because it carries connotations of insane faggotry; and so when you see the phenomena of a person being an insane faggot, calling them a tranny is perfectly appropriate.
Not in spite of the fact that it is insulting, but because it is insulting.
In the attempt by many different kinds of people to shield themselves from devalidation in particular, they will use sophistical arguments whose implications ultimately end up undermining the very possibilities of knowledge, truth, logic, reason, epistemology itself.
Confucius say:
If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things.
If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success.
