>>12853422Probably not. It didn't bother me much reading through it again, as I only used it to partly explain why she goes along with the exhibitionist act, her apprehension to sex for a while and how thst makes her act impulsively impulsively seeing Anon. Maybe making it just one person who coerced her and spread a video, or even just a video of her playing with herself, might have had the same effect without leaving as much of a bad taste. Either way, you can retcon that in your head until I go back and change it. I wouldn't bother usually but it's a fair point and I actually read it again sometimes.