>>87086536Based thicc sweaty NerdRyS
>>87091226It is. That's just the botfag being a botfag but they made several inconsistencies after I skimmed everything since I didn't know this thread's history enough though now I hope most people/don't care
I'll say this and leave it be since the general rule with trolls (who feign ignorance) is "say your piece and shut up so this shit doesn't continue and they can ramble into the void" hence
>>86853004So just skip this post if you don't care
Context
>Started shit over feeling like "their" references/request(s) that were the 1st 2 ones made at the time were "stolen" and started projecting and calling collages/basic ideas "chimeras/Frankensteins" or some shit (even though a popular character in a recent outfit in a standard pose isn't idea theft?)>It was said that the anon would've picked different references if there were more so the pics changed after the shit stirring>botfag does the same shit and tries to act like he's a different guy and both post are his when they aren't thus becoming a hypocrite in the process (or continuing to be since this guys' apparently been a problem before)Mistakes
1 - The little spacing in the 1st post/req
>>8709076 changed but not in the 2nd
>>87090893 post/req so the 1st req is clearly not "a bot" or the schizo or anything like that. The spacing also changed a bit in the 3rd post/response
>>870909172 - The 1st req is a jpg with the same naming sense as "Biboo COPseki" with not dashes or underscores while the second is a png with and underscore and dashes; one even between the "HugeASS-ets" which would've been written like "Huge ASSets" (or based off of Lethal Company given "assets") if they were smarter
3 - On that note, the borders are all uneven and the pics are uncropped in the 2nd req unlike the first
4 - It's also titled "-1" when it would either be "-2" if it was the same guy or "-3" cuz the first req changed it after the shit stirring and even then it went from "Bibutt Squatsexy Reference" which is what picrel is for) to Bijou SQUATseki" so there should really be no number at all
6 - The 3rd post/response to the 2nd isn't even a full 1 minute after the second post while the 2nd req consistently attempts to be roughly 3ish mins from the first so that's either botfag's bot or botfag schizoposting (again I assume)
7 - The first and last line pointed out in this 3rd post already points out how botfag's weird "3 catbox links" argument was wrong either way since the 3rd was an accidental copy of the second which also changed after they noticed it. Unless you think they're honest(ly projecting) and just have poor reading comprehension, can't count and might be ESL
TLDR
As far as burden of proof goes, it's clear botfag is the 2nd poster/req that just wants to make it seem it's also the 1st/3rd poster's are the same guy as himself so their request never gets taken in some weird sort of hypocritical revenge
That and they were likely always the botfag and there was never a third part to begin with
And this 4th post
>>87096895 is probably them again because no one bit their bait, trying to assert that it's the same guy again cuz that's all they can do. At least they likely tried order it as if their (2nd) req was actually the first, And the typing style from proper caps and periods changed to only the former so maybe they can get smarter
They tend to ignore arguments and go 'not reading all that' when they're told to read a sentence of (long enough) post so they did read it and couldn't argue back and/or are ignoring it while the making the same mistake they did with the "3 catbox links" "argument" again
This should be added to that 3rd debunk proof post as well as this
>>86853004 (which they also not-so-surprisingly didn't "seem to understand" twice)
