>>81551289it's hard to say since this medium is genuinely unique. if it were a typical 1:1 hypnokink dynamic, the biggest thing for the tist is for them to respect boundaries in pre-negotiation. being on youtube, the only thing to satisfy boundary respect is for the subject to simply not watch videos that contain suggestions they dont/wouldn't like, or likely to cause abreactions. that's a harder ask to rely on subject agency for subjects that haven't been taught the importance of subject agency, since let's be real, reeflings will think with their tentacles. for example, she's mentioned the idea of making us unable to ink to anyone but her. this is objectively really fucking hot, but I have to realize this will almost certainly cause friction in my irl relationship. the second thing is to realize that most hurt (again in 1:1 dynamics) comes from the tist not being able to properly take care of the subject. stronny is genuinely very skilled at aftercare so for most people this wont be an issue, but a decent fraction will be taken too far and need too much in return. this is sort of like a different flavor of parasocialism and will lead to bad behaviors and thought patterns such as "i'm not good enough for her" or unironic "she hates me," and that's opposite of the experience she wants for us. that leads me to the third thing: suggestibility is a distribution. some people will be mildly suggestible, but others will be taken with ease. when she gives a suggestion of mental ownership or domination, one person might be able to roleplay along and enjoy it as a simple roleplay, but for someone else, something might click in their head and is genuinely taken. it's as if she's casting spells in an rpg and the npcs have randomized magic resistance. not anything she can do about, just be aware of.
a bit of an aside, she did mention very early on about deeply worrying about reeflings having issues with suggestions they didn't like, and would be resolved with a kind of antidote file. while that does show her head is very much in the right place, i've never believed in these files. there's a concept called neural extension that basically is the scientific way of saying "if you don't use it, you lose it." it's effectively the flipside of the 21 day habit thing: if you dont get exposed to a bad trigger/suggestion for a while, that pathway goes "extinct."
there are ways of making sure suggestions are self reinforcing and are mostly immune to extinction though, such as making circular suggestions where one node is a bodily function, such as a suggestion to feel obedient, a suggestion that inking without permission is disobedient, and arousal makes you feel obedient. since you'll always be aroused, the loop will be constantly self reinforcing, and when you "fail," the guilt doubly reinforces the loop. a lot of indoctrination relies of similar thought loop dynamics, generally in the form of double bindstl;dr no, she shouldn't really worry about anything. she's doing everything just fine
