>>30835990>>30836352the /who/ annexation is a completly different case of having brought in a fake /uuu/ rep to agree to this to make it look more official. people keep bringing this up as if its any similar to things that have happened since.
And no, someone coming in with a proposal for anything does not get a pass just cause. A proposal is exactly that, a proposal.
but if you want to use this as an example, someone who DOES come in with a nicely written up proposal for his nation obviously will have a far better chance of convincing the thread to agree to it than jsut someone coming in and saying "hey yeah, i am a new rep for thread /wurgle/ and i want a nation exactly there because why not."
and even now this is still a discussion about the ups and downs of this particular case with /mhm/. again i lack context to the complete nature of how things happened but from what i have read so far, i see no malice from this but a simple fuck up of misunderstanding and failure to provide information by the thread.
i strongly dislike setting bad precedence and have argued as such in the past, to the point i was probably the last anon to still complain about Panons map in regards to /warkop/
but i hate even more to punish someone for a failure that is partially not his, not done in bad faith, and is actually a non-issue besides being a bad precedence, which again, as long as the thread overall udnerstands this as an exeption and that we will be much harder on future cases of this fashion than that is also dealt with.
