>>8176634Interestingly enough that's what the chart for the stream shows
>from one hour and a half into the stream until two hours the stream oscilated between 19k and 20k, staying above for some 20 seconds then dropping back below 20kLooks like a very weird and schizophrenic behaviour for 43k people (double the peak CCV) to join the stream, vote in the poll and leave before 30 seconds have passed and never return but both the math and the chart shows exactly that
>except, of course, if about 30 seconds is how much time it takes for Youtube to determine a new viewer is a "spam viewer" and drop him from the count 