>>107844363I would agree with you but it takes at least a passing familiarity with the people you are using as examples to be able to objectively use them as evidence for your claims.
Your behaviour right now reminds me of this story
>There was a 17th-century Neapolitan nobleman who fought over 20 duels and killed 14 people all because he was defending his opinion on whether Dante or Ariosto was the better Italian poet. >On his deathbed he admitted he’d never even read a single line of their poetryThe initial claims here were bold one. First (at
>>107843284)
>The indie scene is better than the Holo scene these days, there's just more good talentand then another claim (at
>>107843422)
>For pretty much every Hololive member there's an indie who does it betterThey can't be attributed to the same anon or to you yourself (this being an anonymous forum and all) but it was the starting point for this, with anons pointing out their favorites and anon putting forward names that were "just like Holo girl X, except the Holo girls sucks".
You are correct that one could make a judgement of merit without being passionate but one can't possibly make one without being KNOWLEDGEABLE and you so far demonstrated no to be either about the Holo girls nor about the names you're putting forward.
It's just a pseudo intellectual and roundabout way to say
>hololive girls suck!and less entertaining too
