>>100141962>Actually that's just a theory scientists have continuously been trying to prove.Is it really a 'theory' if it's logically necessary?
Like let's compare it with the theory of gravity. Nothing about gravity is necessary, for all we know there could be some magical magnetic-type force that we are completely unaware of that appears to behave exactly the way that we believe gravity does but is not based off of mass like gravity is. Therefore gravity is not logically a necessity.
But if we consider life as we define it (things that grow and reproduce), it is an absolute necessity that at some point non-life would turn into life. Therefore there is no getting around the idea that it is necessary to believe in abiogenesis.
They can make theories about HOW it happens, but it is logically necessary to have faith that it DOES happen, unlike the theory of how gravity works.
I'm Christian so all of this is junk anyway, I'm just playing along with the logical assumptions of the secular worldview and the semantic definition of what a 'theory' is. 