>>91362945not trying to shit stir, i might be misunderstanding the whole point of this card. but maybe you should make a poal on whether anons want the card to be safe for the wider neuro community, or safe for /vt/. it's definitely cute to larp as if we're actually sending a card to her like a normal vtuber. and it's true that certain anons might not want to contribute if their cute neuro art gets put next to stuff like
>>91339672. but those people can always go to discord for their SFW community events. the opposite is not true, this is the only place for anyone who likes even slightly risque or edgy neuro art. they get shit checked and bullied out by power tripping hall monitors elsewhere. just trying to please the most neurotards here. personally i would abstain in the poal because i'm fine with both options. i'd like justice for the recycled nurshroom as well but if nobody cares about either issue then w/e just ignore me