>>23187972>quoting our posts by the way.No, you're not. You aren't even quoting yourself properly, you said
>>23187336>yeah, but that only female worth 10 pts wasn't like your average female, was it, in terms of numberfaggotry which hal loves. None of this bullshit
>Because she is popular and she gets overhyped to hell, so she being rated the same as the men is because of notoriety, she is the expection not the ruleYou literally said it was because he was a numberfag. Not because of hype, because he was a numberfag. You brought numbers into it and are now trying to act like you didn't bring numbers into it.
