>>405757THEN SOME MAY ASK THE QUESTION, "WELL WHAT ABOUT INA?" WHICH IS A BLOODY GOOD QUESTION. IT'S ARGUABLY THE BIGGEST QUESTION THERE IS. IT DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU MEAN BY "INA."
IT'S CLEAR TO ME THAT INA HAS SOME ARCHETYPAL SIGNIFICANCE TO THE CONVERSATION, OTHERWISE TAKOS WOULDN'T EXIST, BUT I'M NOT CERTAIN AT WHAT LEVEL OF ANALYSIS INA COMES INTO PLAY. WHICH BEGS THE QUESTION:
>"DO I LOVE INA? . . . WELL . . . LETS JUST SAY I BEHAVE AS IF THAT LOVE EXISTS.
