>>6961008>That means they added copyrighted material after the factOkay and? You realize it would be trivial to reach out to Cover in that time and go "hey you down to let us use Gura's face for like one second in an ad in exchange for some money" and Yagjew said yes
> NDA in this matter will only pertain to financial disclosure and matters in the contract if there was any IF there was an actual contract And do you have any proof that there wasn't an NDA? Didn't think so.
>>6961092There's a significant difference between Nintendo mistakenly lifting something from a game mod vs accusing one corporation of using another corporation's IP in an ad.
