>>96795164>Success and fameWe get it, anon - you're a pathetic social-climber midwit who thinks mass popularity is equivalent to "being something" or "being a part of something larger than yourself". Hegel's social man, down to a T - that vulgar, servile, invertebrate specimen which only exists and only matters, not by his own reckoning, but SOLELY in the honor and affirmation provided by the other.
No thought given, whatsoever, to WHAT that "something greater" IS, or whether it ACTUALLY MATTERS or whether it's rendered worthless by reality... nothing but a slave of mass opinion and of large corporations, your two gods... what a worthless existence you must lead, and how glad am I to still be fully human, and thereby lack a similar subservience to the fictional construct which is the gestalt collective will.
The fact of the matter is this - so long as any chuuba has her core fanbase, then she is, in fact, BY DEFINITION, INESCAPABLY, part of something bigger than herself. You don't need teeming masses of grays to affirm this; the particular community does not derive its validity from its unbroken connection to some abstract universal psychic human mainstream, but is self-contained, self-affirming, valuable in its own right and by its own standard, in such a way as to render that greater dominant throughline irrelevant and inert within the relative space and scope of the particular; the ONLY space which truly matters, in a way that the universal never possibly could.
Do you accept this truth and reject Hegelian sophistry for the noise and intellectually bankrupt Kraut Idealist gibberish that it truly is? Or, cuckposter that you are, can you only love your wife if she's fucking other men, your attraction to her being directly proportional to her body count and - therefore - the SCOPE of her significance?
Pathetic, repulsive, weak, small. Develop an internal locus of identity or gtfo.
