Quoted By:
Hello, yes, liaschizo here. Let me try to contextualize this "yab", in the sense that this series of events was invited in by Pippa in the first place, with the similar events of Liatnam. Both of these acts are conscious efforts by the performers to bring about two things. First and foremost is the expulsion of undesirable elements of their community. This is to say that the individuals unable to keep an even head and aggressively denigrate Pippa for her role in this emotional betrayal. Pippa can't come out and tell the overly parasocial "wrongthinking" elements of her fanbase to fuck off directly so she has to maneuver herself in a manner as to remain blameless while still executing her goal of shedding the immature and delusional elements that feel entitled to enacting some sort of claim to Pippa and retaliatory action against the male figure. This is an unacceptable stance to hold towards the performer and, paradoxically, is a gift to the outcast emotional offender as it serves as an invitation towards self reflection upon response appropriateness and relationship viability lending to it's self a valuable lesson in emotional resource management in both regards. Secondly and in my opinion more nefariously, it serves to further edify the desired response from the foundational core of supporters who necessarily must not find fault in her faultless actions. The ethical implications of toeing the line with her initial contact of the male performer can be debated but a savvy harine would simply defer to victim blaming and overreaction. The emotional double bind here that really damns the entire exchange is that the emotionally offended pippa enjoyer must either defer to Pippa's attribution of non-malevolence in the tweet OR accept that they were getting bullied by the "better man". The gaslighting psychological torment of the design leverages is a nonchalant disposal of social capital (he operates from a position wherein his relationship to Pippa is so inconsequential that it can be haphazardly gambled and thrown away) that finding any sort of offense to the "playful" "non"implication serves to paint the afflicted mark as "crazy" or "overinvested" which is in a way it's own multifaceted critique of the traditional chuuba cultural standard (which Pippa may very well be trying to take down by playing into this scenario). In this way the only Loser in this exchange is the fan. The subtle psychological complexities of this type of event is only really enabled by the repugnant complexes surrounding the cultural space it occupies and the willingness of all parties to mutually exploit one another in this regard for the delusional engagement of "involvement" in something to be actively emotionally invested in. I think, per usual par excellence, is Lumi's cynical dry paraphrasing of her most hated demographic, giving her the detached cynical knife in the back between the ribs of those who would argue the position as one cold only ever expect from the cold beating hard of peeceegees leezard queen.
I think it goes without saying that a deep reflection from the End of Lia Donothon yab is all neccessary. More so in the similarly broadcasted use of predictive programming (male performers "special day" tweet beforehand / Lia's planned femboy collabo/ASMR bombing by VA call in )but with the particularly Satanic Inversion of the "threat targets". With Lia was the proto-typical "concreep"/pest behavior in lieu of the "promised" femboy(a commentary on the degree of insecurity explicitly displayed by offense to the trespass as passive condemnation) while with Pippa is the quintessential "masculine" threat from her former collab partner. The similarities sans inversion carry on to the final most important aspect of the performer/viewer relationship which is that Pippa and Lia are NOT and never have been for GFE. They are, almost explicitly, Little Sister Experience. Having any sort of "adult romantic relationship" feelings towards either of these characters, in their eyes (the cold predatory eyes of the deranged internet bound shedevils prescribed to torment us for our mutual sins of having fallen to the allure of the network), is deserving of punishment.
The only winning move to take in these types of exchanges is to emotionally assume a protective Big Brother stance towards the talents, either from the kayfabe aspect of protecting the character or the more detached equally delusional protecting the performer from fallout. We're all in trespass for even having played the Game yet here we are and will continue to be until these lessons are learned. (In no way has this been a multi-faceted interpretive learning experience to punish wrong think and subconsciously condition you to be a "better """"man""""" )
