>>25483143>over it being pointed out that your analyses should be taken with a big grain of salt WOW! That’s some incredible insight you brought there!
Who would say an anonymous cantonese yak shaving forum is the equivalent of infinite monkeys on infinite typewriters!?!
Even the fact you felt compelled to point it out is dumber than whoever you are talking about.
Here is your point, distilled to the basics
>considering you don’t have the complete information all you can is derive conclusions from partial information, which might or might not be correct 