>>86132159NTA but I'm currently not being that anon, I'm at this moment being a different anon that the previous post you just linked, the current event in the chain of them that could be considered my life is patently different than the being you responded to. Irregardless of my ontological difference from the previous correspondent I must participate in the discussion in a manner that might mistake my proceeding post to be from the previously mentioned original anon, in conclusion the following post does not refelct upon his worldview or character at all:
lol fagget
