>>45685461The information in question was under a non-disclosure agreement that she violated, anon PLEASE please work on your reading comprehension. It does not matter how little fallout there was, when she signed the damn thing and then violated it.
Had cover given her a slap on the wirst, it would have opened a whole other can of worms in which other NDA breaches would've been compared to rushias. Why does she get off scot free, but not someone else? She broke the rules she agreed to herself. An NDA isn't just a suggestion.