>>47662812That's because they confused the directionality of the correlation there.
Here is for Holo
1) Hololive girls were immensely entertaining
2) that led their streams to catch the attention of a loving and enthusiastic fanbase
3) said fanbase, willing to spread their love for their favorites, make clips with the most interesting moments
4) said interesting moments piqued the interest of a a segment of the population unaware of their existence, turning them into part of the audience
5) said new fanbase, willing to spread their love for their favorites... (goto 3)
The stars audience believe that if they start at step 3) above, they can jumpstart the same virtuous cycle but it is missing an important ingredient
>their precious boys clearly are not entertaining enough to kickstart said cycle on their ownThey can make a hundred thousand million people watch clips like
>pic relatedand it will do them no good because it's clearly not what the audience wants to watch, not in the same big numbers as the holo audience
