>>26862265>Are you a new chumbud and not the touristbud who has been working on the lore?yes
>He was bouncing around the idea of chumbuds being shrimp people who lived deeper underwater the less they wanted to do with humans.yeah, that's pretty much the only way it makes sense for us to go
>>26862333>I think your lore has species/subspecies of shrimpfolkyep, that's correct.
>And I think its confirmed chumbuddies are the size of human children (90-100cm)?that's kind of out there, gura has shown to be way bigger than us on stream
would something like pic be feasible?
it doesn't make sense for us to budge on living underwater in an ocean-like environment