>>85057574I mean, the cliquecord did have a thread where people gave input on the design.
But if you think about it, you can categorize this stuff a few different ways.
FWMC's response can be things like showing on stream (/vt/ sings LTSM and the drawboard really early on that I think was for their one month anniversary), mentioning on stream (happis), quote tweeting, retweeting (clips/fanart all the time), replying (on twitter or youtube, including showing up in YT chat like the 1 year anniversary clipshow), liking/hearting, or just not mentioning at all.
Fan participation can range from one person or a small group of people doing something independently (flower stand, fanart, age of advent, simple clips, edited clips, MGS VA cameo), to seeking input but not content to be included in the final product (happis), to being a compilation of fan submissions (LTSM, drawboard, birthday book, new years or christmas wishes website). Something like the ruffian VN was mostly a one-man show, but contains fan submissions, so it's sort of a blend of the first and last categories here.
Attribution can include a name attached to a one-man show type project (flower stand), a name as credits to a one-man show (youtube clip channels), no names (cameo, happi, LTSM, simple clips, maybe fanart if you don't include signatures), submitters' names in credits with a leader also in credits (anniversary clipshow), submitters' names attached to content with a leader in credits (wishes website, ruffian VN), and submitters' names attached to content without a prominent leader (birthday book, drawboard).
Complicating this is that any project has to be posted by someone, which can be whoever is "managing" or making the project/content (including fanart and clips), a generic project account like LTSM or the anniversary clipshow, or a third party/not posted as a project at all like the happi, and further complicating it is people tweeting or superchatting their involvement with a project.
So you could almost make a chart with the input of who participated and how people were attributed in the content itself, and the output being how FWMC reacted.
