>>4862660Anyone who knows even the slightest amount of good information about Japanese companies knows that, anon.
They're cowards and sulkers, but that isn't malicious. It's just waste. When there's malicious intent, it is far more obvious. If they wanted her gone, they would not have had her talked about ever again. They wouldn't have done anything with her for PR. They would've locked her in a back room forever. They would've stopped allowing her to monetize streams and starve her out. They would've imposed a collab ban for her across the entire company, not just the golden gooses over at EN. There wouldn't have been any half measures.
Japanese business practices don't operate on wishy-washy measures like what we see at COVER when they want to expel someone. They make their life hell and deny them every comfort, every pleasure, needle them to the rules and physically restrict them from other people, all while encouraging their employees to react the same way to the targeted person.
Eventually, they strike their names from the books entirely, once they get them to quit, and erase any mention of them from the company products or credits. People who think COVER did anything other than react to a bad situation in a retarded, bumbling, "I don't know how to handle this but I'm scared" way are just outright uninformed on the subject.
There are faults, large ones, legitimate ones. But building up a facade to get mad at doesn't improve anything compared to working off of reality.
