>>83345771Your perception of this is entirely wrong. Banning him for his reaction to a melty is still a disciplinary action. Nothing is changing the characteristics that make it anything other than a harsher alternative of disciplinary action. So, first off, you're not even making a point, you just don't even understand what you are saying.
The door is closed (divorced), it can just be reopened again. What matters are the evidence that dictate whether or not the door will be reopened again.
Secondly, you are also wrong. The point was that from her POV, Tuffnar is removed from her Followers list. And it is the same Followers list that is metaphorically apart of her acknowledgement that you have married her.
Since you didn't read the Twitch rules it states: "Banned users will also be removed from your followers". His account following her does not mean anything. It is the same as someone being divorced and choosing to keep their wedding ring on.
She has divorced Fleece, Fartrune and Tuffnar in the act of banning them both metaphorically and within the clear set of rules she in place.
>And as much as you want to shit on his art getting a like and downplaying it, it's solid evidence that conflicts with your narrativeThe art that she didn't reply to and shown that she wants no further communication with him, yes.
Thanks for your time but you are rather stupid and have no idea what you are talking about.
