>>69079560i honestly don't think there's a world where niji can even try to pretend that anything that selen/doki did meets the bar for defamation. sure they said mean things, but where's the harm, and thereby, what's the remedy?
>muh stocksthey lost three talents before two months had even passed in the year and rumor says they're going to lose more. there is no world in which you can point at some EN social media posts and claim that it tanked your JP stock prices more than the talents themselves leaving the company. investors dont care about drama, they care about future profits, and losing your big names implies you'll pull in less money in the future.
say you even prove defamation, and we assume that doki's statements somehow were influential on the stock drop, how much more influential could they be than the talents leaving in the first place? if we split the stock drop 33/33/33 to each of the three talents who've left so far, how much of selen's portion is them then going on to complain about the company's treatment versus just no longer being employed?
i dont think there's any world in which that case is anything but a pet project that sinks money and makes investors nervous as well. there's no world in which you recover enough money to make pursuing the suit worth it even if you win. what's doki going to do, shell out 150 million to your company for the stock? they absolutely don't have that cash. if you put your in-house council on a case like this you're just wasting their time, and no firm would take this case without demanding so much money that you're basically burning pallets of the stuff.
