>>83344094I'm saying that viewing it as more than a punishment is wrong and can impact the punishment's effectiveness
Regardless of how you fully view it, not being able to interact with your wife(that you love) would undoubtedly be suffering to anyone, but you shouldn't cope with the ban by twisting it, calling it playful
>>83344199It's up to you what end up believing and what parts of the story you end up buying and subscribing to, but at least don't present your view on things as the objective narrative or facts
>>83344411First off, fleece was banned as a reaction to his melty, not as a disciplinary action, so you can't have this comparison
Also, she didn't close the door, nor is it closed at all
Fleece refused to take a step back and calm down twice ehen presented with the choice until he himself divorced and left, the ban was for his outburst, not signaling divorce
Fleece could, according to her words, come and knock on the door, open it slowly, apologise, then come back(given "no ban is permanent")
Secondly, you are straight up wrong about the objectivity of your claim
He doesn't appear to be still following, yes, but only to her
In terms of objectivity, he's still following her, just that twitch hides the fact that he's following from her channel
Keyword being "hides", it's still objectively true that his account is following hers
And as much as you want to shit on his art getting a like and downplaying it, it's solid evidence that conflicts with your narrative
Now, be nise
>>83344664You can always change for the better
