>>87243498What self-respecting pseud would miss a chance to reference Althusser when a discussion of structuralism comes up? I must warn you right now that your card-carrying Continental privileges are in danger of immediate revocation. You can't fool me by bringing up Lacan now, *anglo*. Your complete failure to substantively engage with the critical deconstruction of your liberal individualist perspective and instead respond with a whole load of wild fantasies about your imaginary friend is pretty damning indication that you very well lack sufficient mental height to get on this ride.
