>>40997429The history of Tsunderia discussion on this site is pretty long and complicated, but what
>>40998021 said is basically correct. Just missing the detail that Tsunderia discussion on /trash/ was done in /wvt/ rather than in a dedicated /tsun/ general, these threads only split-off into their own thing when /vt/ was created.
There was some talk about the company on /jp/ even before that, but it wasn't really noteworthy and people only really cared about (or knew about) Kana.