>>99757707See that's why I call you a pseud, because you can't think. You see the word 'trap' and pattern-match it to a stock script that word frequently correlates with like a chatbot, not getting the fact that I was talking about a logical conclusion that follows naturally from the premise and inviting my interlocutor to participate in it, not because that would be the wrong course to take, but because it would be right, and my fondest hopes are still for collaboration, you know?
Well, it still takes two to tango, anyways.
