>>93241005>why even include hypno?The popular consensus is that hypnosis *can* be real, so it's dangerous for money; the reality of the situation ("you only do what you want to," "you can't be induced into a 'voodoo zombie' state without drugs") isn't even in the conversation. You're arguing the rules of Risk with a housecat, one party isn't willing to even understand the terms.
And the moralfagging over "doing something against your will/outside of your control" that is central to the zeitgeist's idea of hypnosis certainly isn't helping.
>>93241125It's a blatant double-standard of the porn industry. "Daddy" stuff is largely considered harmless for all the usual reasons (women doing it willingly, large audience of women into it, big amount of money), where "Mommy" stuff usually gets a side-eye at the least. Something something "society's views on male and female sexual dynamics and the consequences of viewing men as predators and women as harmless little prey animals."
I'm done being a pseud over niche porn, back to your regularly-scheduled /vag/.
>>93241313It's a bit of a TOS minefield because it's usually considered bannable, but so are things like animal genitalia (ie monster futa like wolfgirl/horsegirl) and the TOS doesn't get enforced evenly; most things fly under the radar, until they don't.
It's usually something like "-x- puts you in a trance" or "-y- puts you under her spell" to avoid the automod, and then it's still a diceroll if it gets reported/caught by a random content scan.
The TOS is there, but they rarely enforce it until it matters.
-Investor- has done both hypno and animal genitalia (wolf futa with knot) recently, and none has been banned from Patreon, FWIW. 