>>94896293>tweet all day about the groomerantis and try and tell her to ban themyeah, there it is, i wonder who wrote this post ;)
also no, this isn't true
>idc what you post- you're clueless or misrepresenting what i'm saying
don't bother replying
>>94896296>n-no u!!!yeah that's what i thought
she's said worse about you "people" here than me, which should say a lot if you weren't a groomerantinigger running your narrative
