>>67212683> Copyright would only be in violation of you copied the art almost exactly, with little to no transformation, And yet vanilla ice settled with queen to the tune of 4 million over a sampled sound that was used in transformative work. He didn’t “copy the whole song almost exactly” and still had enough fault to pay that out. The law isn’t whayever convenience you think it is to justify your prattling on this board, I‘m bored of this discussion.
