>>104544469Just so people can take their own conclusions, here is the full quote and context
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/fact-check-charlie-kirk-once-205500283.htmlNot a burger so that's all foreign to me but this part seems to be the core of his reasoning
>Now, we must also be real. We must be honest with the population. >Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty. >Driving comes with a price. 50,000, 50,000, 50,000 people die on the road every year. That's a price. >You get rid of driving, you'd have 50,000 less auto fatalities. But we have decided that the benefit of driving — speed, accessibility, mobility, having products, services — is worth the cost of 50,000 people dying on the road. >So we need to be very clear that you're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen.>You could significantly reduce them through having more fathers in the home, by having more armed guards in front of schools. >We should have a honest and clear reductionist view of gun violence, but we should not have a utopian one.From my POV his point is not
>people should be murdered but
>the benefits of an armed society make it so that zero deaths is an utopian goal 