>>7176266Whatever was not either "male" or "female" in the Wiki got a spot check
>enter channel>listen to voice>eyeball the modelSorry anons, not sorry, complicating stuff unnecessarily is very non numberfag-like.
Unless it is one of the heavy hitters whose mislabeling would skew the aggregate numbers per sex it doesn't matter at all.
>>7176354>Out of curiosity does the current data-set have labels for streams?The Holos dataset, yes but it was a rough first pass based on stream title alone.
>then I realized I can just scrape the tags used for each streamWhen I unify the data for Holos and Nijis I'll do it better the second time