>>67703746>>67703763Are these bot replies? if we are talking about the validity of covers it doesn't matter what they read, the point is that women read a lot and we can use harlequin book covers as a way to judge their taste.
No one talked about high literature (which is a meme anyway, men read science fiction and history books, not high literature).
>>67703697I don't care who started it. It's the same issue I have with /a/'s idea of shoujo. All ignorance and laziness spouted with amazing confidence.
