>>69115371You taking that stance implies that you take empirical knowledge as being potentially faulty and that's the flaw in your logic that makes it solipsistic despite your denial. Flat earthers focus on the institutions that utilize a more complex cosmological model: Rightfully point out that they have been deceitful but then conflate that with your thesis as opposed to giving any credence to various forms of independent confirmation -as well as clear indications of what they are actually lying about- using opposition fallacy and guilt by association in order to cast doubt over a shared and proven reality. Thus my point in referencing Philip K. Dick's quote and highlighting what has yielded tangible results and advancement.
