>>46703381Crabber Grabbers
>>46703582What I meant was just intercourse in general, pov or otherwise. Most of the die-hard architects make "fat girl standing/sitting and grabbing belly while looking nervous at viewer" which I guess is what they're into so not a criticism, just noting the exception.
>>46704028>Definitely not anything that would cause a Resonance Cascade. Nope.Well if FubuMio are the science team, who's in the hazard suit?
and who is the gman?>Only thing missing now are built-in shades.I tried, might see if there's a lora for Adam Jensen out there, gotta be
>>46704091Kek
>>46704177>Although, even if I could, I probably wouldn't and I would wager most architects wouldn't either. 90% of the time I want to see the belly, thighs, and hips and don't care about anything elseI can respect that, just with how things usually go around here, I had expected the inevitable horny would take over and they would be sprinkled in here and there. But then I guess if you're more attracted by full sacks of flesh, looking into a chasm would be the opposite of your object of attraction kek.
Maybe it's also the nervous faces a lot of them have, like they look self-conscious. I suppose coomer prompts also give a chance to show the chuuba being loved and having a good time, and maybe that's what is the 'missing piece' for me.
I don't know man, the lanes of thought I've driven down typing out this response has left me more confused than when I started, I guess from my outsider's perspective, I like seeing the girls be happy, and the faces I see in architecture rarely convey that to me, and maybe that leaves me feeling a little hollow when seeing them.
But then again, I'm just one guy, and it's just my opinion.
