Quoted By:
i looked away and you're having the argument about chest sizes AGAIN but it's really genetically a really complicated one there are pros and cons to each, big breasts might be indicative of increased hormonal activity and higher fertiliy, smaller breast size might be indicative of female hormonal deficiency which dependign on the gene might decrease lifespan because the ovaries aren't functioning properly and producing an insufficient amount of estrogen and progesterone, or alternatively, with a different gene, increase lifespan because the ovaries are producing comparitively less, but only because they;re slower, and hte rest of the bodily processes including aging slow down with it. it's somehting that tends to trend in lots of animals, well, basically like, all organisms pretty much, the more energy spent towards reproduction the lower the lifespan , it's a biological trade of between longetivity and reproduction, and it even applies in humans, having kids lowers your lifespan. smaller breasts are indicative of less hormones, less hormones, but not an insufficiency or imbalance, is indicative of being less genetically geared towards reproduction BLAH BLAH BLAH well guess what shitheads its a dumb thing to argue about but, in the end, it just comes down to the smaller the boobs the less tissue there is to get breast cancer, while statistically i'm pretty sure it's still just as likely, but there'll be less cancer there so it'l lbe easier to remove and it means you'll survive longer probably.
TLDR i'm sleepy and going to bedfge i wont write a tldr but basically small boob = live longer
