>>74129616>one person guessed by deduction that it was a furry dog fucking thing. that's what a deduction isI think that would be an "abduction" (you know they have that mark, and you know some general rules like how other marks work, so you formulate a hypothesis on the cause of that mark.)
But yeah, those paw marks have nothing to do with furry degeneracy except in the mind of degenerate anons.
