>>51375965Me too! And I will write more as I hack through my "to read" list. I would really really love to see some analyzes of writing styles and so on between contributors.
Sadly I cannot write anything like that about my own text.
Another thing I kinda would like is to have a few writers write the same scene, or the same story (or re-write each other's existing ones), just to see how each differs in style. Another fun one would be to attempt to emulate someone else's writing style, but I do not know how plausible this would be.
Sort of like those "draw this character in different styles / your style" things, but for writing.
>>51379526>>51379855It is difficult, and does take time and effort but caffeine helps. That thing took me about 2 hours 15 minutes to write (I did time it)
Especially troubling is that I dont know what type of criticism and feedback would be valid. I just know how to look at text through the lens I personally have and not much else, which will always end up with me seeing stuff where there isn't and risks me mistaking style choice as errors. Just because a text works or doesnt work for me doesnt mean it would be the same in a more "objective" lens.
>>51392575I shall reply later, need to go out to the town to run an errand and maybe eat something.
