>>95383262But anon, how would you know that and be so sure? Could it be that Booquet, Dragooner, and most of the few "anons" that got a delivery are you under pretenses? That couldn't be anon, right? That would mean you were lying, and I believe someone like you, who holds such righteous views, would never do that. Oh no, that couldn't be. Right?
>>95321831>>95284155Let's just hope this doesn't affect the artists; it would be a shame if they were being fooled under false pretenses, amire amirte?
