>>91441900Yes, I said that some of the people replying to him were complaining and explaining why the chants happen.
And also provided their posts (everyone deleted their stuff a few hours later).
He just asked a question and I brought it here because I thought it was interesting.
An anon said something that picked my interest but didn't explain why
>>91399829. I was going to say, because of that reply, that we (western and nips) aren't that different after all. I thought nips were being overtly sensitive but after he said an indie band might find it disrespectful, it gave me pause. I still want to know why though.
I don't know how to make it more clear that
1) he asked a question in the least offensive and non-combative way possible, just wanted to know why.
2) some people wanted to talk about it but didn't have an opportunity until he made that post and some of them weren't very nice (he locked the replies to mutuals only after a while)
