>>53824913HAHA! You FOOL! You fell for my trap card! By solely choosing to expand on the first example in my previous post, I have baited you into continuing the argument on argumentum ad populum using mass androcide as a pretext, which has caused you to foolishly ignore
>>53817120, a textbook example of argumentum ad populum!
In this post the foid asserts that "Even men know how shit men are," See the problem there?! She's claiming her argument as truth based on what she claims is the opinion of the majority of men! And you foolishly did not realize that, therefore your entire counterargument falls apart!
Hehe... looks like I win again. Come back when you're a little bit stronger, buddy.
