>>43686275There is one particular case that will be the case to end all cases.
>Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmithhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Warhol_Foundation_for_the_Visual_Arts,_Inc._v._GoldsmithLong story short
>Andy Wahrol used a copyright picture of Prince, painted a painting and soldThe case is
>is this "transformative" nature of the new work enough to make it "fair use" and not copyright infringementIf the Supreme Court says "no, it is not" it's game over, the implied "transformative" clause of "fair use" is dead right there.