>>85998839>But it doesn't matter that he said she was his wife three days later and that they should live together?Again, never said they weren't married or divorced. You just didn't read anything.
Where in that screenshot does he say that he wants her to live with him? The part before or after he says explicitly that he doesn't want her as a wife because she's useless?
>>85999203>They also both did not agree to a separation because Froot came back running to him.So you definitely agree that she got dumped?
>She said she came back to himHe was the one who came back to her. These DMs are from April and they're the only actual indication that they were getting ready to start their relationship again.
>He decided to take me backHe specifically decided to go back, at most you can say that she could've gotten back with him before that point but if thats the case then they could've just as easily broken things off again, it's a totally redundant hypothetical and changes absolutely nothing aside from making him seem even more schizophrenic.
Why lie and say she immediately got back with him 3 days later when there was nothing to indicate that? Even allowing you the most generous benefit of a doubt, there's nothing except this image and their facebook posts to indicate they got back together at all so why try and frame it like anything else aside from being purposely dishonest? If you wanted to back up your post than why not just use proof that you know directly talks about the subject of it instead of hastily grabbing screenshots and saying that they indirectly prove you right when they don't? There's 0 point to being so vague if you're confident in what you say, so why try and do 20 posts of "Gotchas" instead of saying something coherent and straight forward?
You don't actually know how to prove something which is why eventually it just ends up going back to hypotheticals or "Gotchas" that you can use to get people to repeat themselves so that it looks like you actually made progress or had something of value to say.
