>>29403497>I am not a chuuba nor female. Man, you suck at predictions lmaoI said the people who get butt blasted by this are personally invested. So how is my prediction wrong?
Nobody talked about you specifically. Your post does reek of raging narcissism though.
Oh what, you're admitting you got butt blasted despite not being female? That's most unfortunate I suppose but I don't remember asking.
>Please present your statistical analysis that bears out this alleged correlation.Firstly, there is none. If you actually read my post you'd realize I'm just deferring the consideration of external validity from an initial assumption and prediction.
Secondly, for the latter part, correlation isn't a word used exclusively by scientific tests, it has and will continue to be used descriptively outside of study design.
The fact you get bamboozled by the word correlation and you immediately think that means "science" because it's a big scary science word is pretty terrifying as far as logical leaps go though.
I know this is unnecessary and all elementary, but it's worth also keeping in mind that a prediction doesn't have to follow the basis of statistical analysis or similar, formal or otherwise.
Not to mention that observations are sometimes the starting point of further research, not necessarily the function of already completed or continued research goals.
To be clear, my prediction is simply a prediction from observation, as most tend to be. Did you read my post?
Observations are made to make predictions or inferences. Those predictions are guesses (hypotheses), albeit not wild guesses, and are often what form the basis of an initial research goal as much as they are a possible tool in the ongoing process itself.
You probably don't even know what I mean by that, or anything else here for that matter. Not really sure why you're engaging with things you don't know anything about like scientific concepts which aren't even a part of my original argument.
If you weren't illiterate you'd have read my original comment and realized I passively admitted my prediction could literally be completely wrong, which I was fine with admitting because I will simply observe, and I mean to observe the current batch of /asp/ies in particular, to see if my prediction holds true and I'm not too worried if it doesn't.
ALSO VERY IMPORTANT. Keep in mind that a prediction is technically just a correlation lagged by one epoch.
I thought I should clear that up because the language might be confusing as far as interchangeability and switching goes.
>>29406787You think this, but the reality is it's hard for men to truly feel platonic about people of the opposite sex.
In a relationship (supposedly platonic) where a woman feels and acts platonically (the best case), men will often still have non-platonic feelings and desires about their female friend, more often than not, I.E., a majority of the time, and more so compared to the inverse by gender.
Now, if that's true, imagine how difficult it must be for a man in a relationship a woman believes is platonic, (genuinely put yourself in that situation, I'm sure we can all relate on some level as men) when said woman constantly talks about how she wants to fuck him. I.E., the woman feels the supposedly platonic relationship is platonic, but doesn't act platonically. This of course can include even jokes, to some women's surprise, but also inappropriate behavior, and any physical contact.
E.G., Rena has made no less than 5 comments about how she wants to beat, fuck, rail, and "fuck Faust" in the discord, and I simply don't think that this kind of behavior behooves the "ethical behavior of a streamer."
I think this is just an important thing for the female streamers to keep in mind if they want to collab with males, not because males are evil sexpests always in waiting for an opportunity to advance a relationship on a naive woman... although in some ways that could be an apt description... but rather because if the women collabing with these males genuinely care about them as human beings, as people, then they should consider their real honest feelings, regardless of what they want to 'make true' and should seek to not cause these men any further emotional turmoil, not that these women are intentionally doing this, just that it's not fair to these poor men to be unintentionally strung along by the machinations of their own minds and primal drive. It's also not fair to these naive women to be unintentionally doing this to men when they most likely don't want to cause anyone alarm or distress, heartbreak, or disappointment (KEEPING IN MIND, that men often also believe non-platonic feelings for female friends are mutual, whereas women rarely do).
Wanting a situation to be one way, does not make it so, although wanting a situation to be one way, will oft make us believe it to be.
DOI is 10.1177/0265407512443611 if you want to look at the study for everything above.
