>>12347497>>12349045This is all true. First of all, most individuals learn to differentiate fictional scenarios from reality since early childhood, and it's actually common and healthy for the brain to have taboo thoughts so they're not an indicator for morality. There's lots of people who fantasize a few times or regularly about incest or rape and even get a liking to it, because it's the way your mind reality checks
In fact, imagining sexual immoral scenarios also serves as a tool for trauma survivors and this doesn't exclude lolicon, because victims can imagine idealized versions of their experiences without having to revive it and can leave the fantasy whenever they want because they find themselves in a safe space
For the normal lolicon, they are attracted to the “aura of cuteness” that lolis irradiate rather than projecting any pedophilic urges. I have to say, this
>>12349419 isn't entirely wrong, overexposure to the media can have negative effects, but the opposite is also true as long as the person has control over themselves
It's also true that loli porn is appealing to pedophiles, but most lolicon communities self-police themselves if someone expresses attraction to actual youths. Also, there's a reasonable belief that lolicon leads to a decrease of child sexual abuse due to giving an outlet to those who would otherwise prey on children
Finally, people can argue that you're attracted to fictional characters meant to be/look like children, but there's nothing wrong with not feeling attracted to secondary sexual characteristics (which most lolis actually have) as long as you aren't sexualizing real minors and feel attracted to adults
I'm no psychologist, but I've seen multiple arguments over lolis and taboo fiction, and it all comes down to professionals not caring as long as you keep it as just fantasies and not hurting yourself over it
