>>49404401>>49403896Boxing for camel punjabi pre-crack no virus 2019.
https://files.catbox.moe/ocbzwg.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/jvcrk3.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/9vvmjd.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/qs5av3.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/im1mxy.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/kpby0x.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/2tl307.png>>49404467So they're... Wholus?
I'll see myself out>>49404709Are these "prompters that are always bitching about not liking requests" in the room with us right now?
Like I get that a lot of requests go unfulfilled, but you don't exactly see prompters responding to them going "I don't like this one, I won't do it". People do the requests they want, it's not an obligation.
Yeah, a lot of requests get left behind and never taken, but that should be fine. If you're mad about not having your request taken, try hitting up someone's pixiv or, you know, commissioning it from a traditional art source. The idea of the inverted anchor doesn't really make much sense to me because... well If I want to make something, I don't feel the need to announce it to people so they can request it, I'll just make it and post it, and that will be it. Way I see it, the reverse anchor already exists, it's called replying to a post and asking "that's really cool, can you do the same but for X character or with Y outfit alteration", and that's worked just fine for a while now.
Generally speaking, I don't want to influence requests because that kinda defeats the point IMO. Requests are a way to find new inspiration and think outside the box when the usual isn't cutting it anymore and you need that shot of fresh ideas.
>>49405675>spoilerI can only imagine
for now 